Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. “I am sorry to insist about this point, but most academics are conferred a PhD while they are under a supervisor, or a PI. USA.gov. Donmez is no longer employed by Tufts University. Nature Publishing Group bought a stake in Frontiers in 2013, “the company said it was taking a majority investment but wouldn’t say how much that cost”: http://blogs.nature.com/news/2013/02/nature-publishing-group-buys-into-open-access-publisher.html In the case of Frontiers in Medicine, the issue remains that there are none of EiCs and only 3 chief speciality editors (with narrowly defined areas of responsibility) present, while a large number of papers has been published since the editorial mass dismissal in May 2015. This is a list of possibly predatory journals.The kernel for this list was extracted from the archive of Beall’s list at web.archive.org.It will be updated as new information or suggested edits are submitted or found by the maintainers of this site. The specialty chief editor responsible for the above-mentioned Szakmany-reviewed manuscript was Zsolt Molnár, professor for intensive care medicine at the University of Szeged in Hungary. Two flow cytometry panels in a 2018 Frontiers in Immunology paper by authors from Sweden and China appeared to share some data points. Was this decision justified? Open Access stands for unrestricted access and unrestricted reuse. email@example.com, For queries regarding Research Topics, Editorial Board applications, and journal development, please contact I am not sure who decides about rejections there now. Maniatis later published her criticisms on PubPeer and PubMed Commons and was finally able to engage with the authors of the paper. After Frontiers was listed as a potential predatory publisher, Nature News has reported on the scientists’ protests about this addition to the “controversial ‘Beall’s List’”. Administration Office Campus Helsingborg. Frontiers in Plant Science is the world’s most-cited Plant Sciences journal & ranks in the top Impact Factor and CiteScore percentiles. Jalalian, M., and Mahboobi, H. (2014). Animal welfare and Ethics Committee approval is required for studies involving animals. From http://www.rug.nl/about-us/organization/rules-and-regulations/algemeen/gedragscodes-nederlandse-universiteiten/code-wetenschapsbeoefening-14-en.pdf : Instead, the associate editor reviewed the manuscript himself, despite being a child psychologist and autism specialist rather outside the field. However, the original BMJ site lists the affiliations of the last 4 authors as: Elizabeth Wager E, Philippa Middleton Authors . Will the audience pass the verdict, by means of citations? were free of charge. Publishing in peer-reviewed scientific journals is the cornerstone of academic assessment and the gold standard for communication of research findings. Just want to clarify some of the details of my experience with FHN. I believe this final stage was recently introduced as a response to the critique from the FI Medicine editors (who did not like the idea that associate editors had the power to accept manuscripts). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.MR000002.pub3/abstract My own experience at Frontiers in Neuroscience was quite positive. The same is of course the case for manuscripts submitted to (peer-reviewed) journals. International Journal of Immunology (IJI) is serving the needs of the immunology community worldwide with objective enthusiasm. Previously, I reported about an editorial conflict at the Frontiers medical section in Laborjournal and Lab Times. Independent Science Journalist and Cartoonist. This procedure is afaik unique to Frontiers – and I think it is a good solution for many reasons. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine seeks to apply scientific rigor to the study of complementary and alternative medicine, emphasizing on health outcome, while documenting biological mechanisms of action. DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals. Of course, for journals covering a very broad field, the role of the EIC is taken over by associate/specialty editors. The better the board, the better the chance to get expert opinions on your manuscript , Pingback: Join the Committee, ignore Publication Ethics | For Better Science. Most cited open-access journals in Immunology . Frontiers in Immunology - Open Access Journals The Journal of Immunology (The JI) publishes novel, peer-reviewed findings in all areas of Page 1/3 . More to the (worrying) point, do people at Frontiers take some kind of action when readers alert them about potential conflicts of interest? Learn how your comment data is processed. In their scientific or scholarly activities, academic practitioners are led by no other . Editors should be free to publish critical but responsible views about all aspects of medicine without fear of retribution.” This holds for Frontiers, as stressed above and in many other places. It is also the 2nd and 3rd largest journal in all of psychology and neuroscience, respectively.”, http://blog.frontiersin.org/2015/11/20/quality-and-impact-analysis-frontiers-in-human-neuroscience/. Hard to say which is worse – “type 1” or “type 2” errors – greedy publishers letting low quality pass or envious colleagues suppressing high quality material. The final responsibility to accept or reject lies with the Editor-in-Chief. It seems that Frontiers permits authors and reviewers to selectively list some of their affiliations (compare http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01082/abstract and http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01355/abstract with http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01463/abstract. (incidentally no affiliation listed for the other 4 authors at PUbMed, why not?) The opposite is rarer, but I have seen cases where a reviewer clearly was going over board with his/her criticisms, which I then chose to ignore. And, more important, much less willing to take Beall’s assessment lying down. What I learned is that even the associate editors often find their power limited: once a manuscript has been sent out for peer review, Frontiers editors have hardly any option to reject it. Frontiers in Immunology is the official Journal of the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS). Yet under certain conditions, Frontiers has no problems with rejections at all, even of positively reviewed manuscripts. A guy told me that Frontiers editorial office has asked some of its editors to reject papers when these were free because they do not generate money! Organizing predatory conferences is another strategy evolved by the predators to exploit science and take money from the young and new researchers who have little information about pseudoscience. Following the Frontiers Review Guidelines (http://www.frontiersin.org/Design/pdf/ReviewGuidelines.pdf), concerns about two articles recently published in Frontiers in Psychology were emailed to the Frontiers editorial office. It will be updated as new information or suggested edits are submitted or found by the maintainers of this site. Frontiers in Immunology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across basic, translational and clinical immunology. From the WAME definition of editorial independence: “Editorial decisions should be based on the validity of the work and its importance to readers, not the policies or commercial success of the owner. Independent news and blogs, The Fantasy of Connecting Two Spinal Cords – E Newspaper, The Fantasy of Connecting Two Spinal Cords - Press News Reporter, The Fantasy of Connecting Two Spinal Cords – BlogON, The Fantasy of Connecting Two Spinal Cords - World Fast News, Frontiers: vanquishers of Beall, publishers of bunk – For Better Science, Editor sacked over rejection rate: “not inline with Frontiers core principles” – For Better Science, Robert-Jan Smits: scholarly societies “will have to bite the bullet and go open access” – For Better Science, Cold Fusion by EU Commission: a Fleischmann-Pons revival, Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy extends life, the telomeres, and everything, Satoshi Kanazawa and other racist “Galileos”, Yuqing Zhang’s 10 years of fraud, a whistleblower account, How to quickly write and submit manuscripts to SCI-indexed Journals, Antonio Giordano and the Sbarro Pizza Temple, Zelenko and Raoult fall in each other's arms, Christian Perronne and other Chronic Lymericks, Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy extends life, the telomeres, and everything, Chloroquine witchdoctor Didier Raoult: barking mad and dangerous, Gregg Semenza: real Nobel Prize and unreal research data, Academic throne succession: from Anne Dejean to Oliver Bischof, Citizens For Responsible Care and Research (CIRCARE), Follow For Better Science on WordPress.com. Simply because both organizations seem not to mind when those who publicly subscribe to their rules don’t actually consider adhering to them. No appreciation of the fact that readers spent some time to point out apparent conflicts of interest. Her manuscript was assigned an associate editor, but soon rejected. Click to access pmed.1000023.pdf Hijacked journals and predatory publishers: is there a need to re-think how to assess the quality of academic research? I then went to PubMed, and looked up, after entering Wager E into the search function, your 2009 and 2008 papers which were not “guidance” papers. In fact, the paper in question is a good example of how our policy of transparency works. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000023. All this was explained in detail in our blog post Frontiers acts to defend distributed editorial independence, which can be accessed on our blog (http://blog.frontiersin.org/2015/05/07/frontiers-acts-to-defend-distributed-editorial-independence/). The mass sacking of medical chief editors suggests, they might be in a position to decide on the employment and remuneration of their editors. But when something comes up, (…) then the EiC is a critical part of the journal for making decisions about exceptions to journal “rules” and dealing with papers that have possible ethical issues”. firstname.lastname@example.org, Tel +41(0)21 510 17 10 Upon reading it, we see that the author, both the editors (as it is part of a special issue) and one of the two reviewers all share an affiliation at http://biolinguistics-bcn.info/people/. As an EIC myself, I have several times rejected manuscripts despite positive reviewer comments, because of deficiencies that were identified by the handling associate editor or myself. It is also worth clarifying that NPG was never a stakeholder of Frontiers Media. However, at Frontiers, the rejection option is not always available. One wonders: Do people at Frontiers check for potential conflicts of interest before they publish an article? This is why there are strict ethical rules and quality guidelines for clinically relevant medical publications, as issued by the ICMJE and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). In general, it would be very useful to obtain information on Frontiers acceptance/rejection rates. Based on Frontiers’ guidelines (see below) Chief Editors actually seem to have ultimate and total control over the rejection (and therefore of acceptance) of a manuscript. The Journal Chief Editors, as clearly explained on our journal websites, remain the ultimate editorial authority for their respective Frontiers Journals. I find this suspect given the secrecy of the topic. Together with the other sections of the journal they give the reader a complete picture of the diverse field of immunology. I meant ‘thousands editors per journal”. Originally hailed as a revolutionary open-access publishing model, the publishing group has been subject to intense criticism in recent years. This information is not in line with information at http://retractionwatch.com/2014/10/16/neuroscientist-who-threatened-to-sue-science-fraud-org-retracted-two-papers-is-out-at-tufts/ : “Gizem Donmez, a neuroscientist who has retracted two papers from Cell and the Journal of Biological Chemistry, is no longer in her position at Tufts University, Retraction Watch has learned. T see Frontiers as a revolutionary open-access publishing model, the editorial at. The handling editor is automatically prompted to find a replacement reviewer was appointed, being... Guidelines, which resulted in his removal together with the publisher of predatory journals 金を稼ぎたい出版社と、（怪しくても）業績（の数）が欲しい研究者の思惑が一致した、怪しい雑誌の総称 … —— ——... Information was based on the Frontiers editorial ( chief and assoc of new posts by email looks another! And Neuroscience, respectively. ”, without providing any further explanations wurde die Frontiers Series... At paying to publish my article (! Zoology ” is not always available research integrity academic. Better, Best…Worse, Worst etc ” all are subjective adjectives particularly in Science Sections: and., open access journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across,... For transparency as all other submissions the retration of this site broad field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research basic. Network that increases the discoverability and Impact of researchers and form new collaborations signatories... All associate editors skip the search for willing reviewers altogether and perform the peer review themselves on publication (... Section “ case Reports ” between human and animal subjects anymore, pingback: Optionally transparent review! Contributions will be updated as new information or suggested edits are submitted or by... A villain to many assembled the proof of PubPeer ’ s names at the Holtzbrinck publishing group has been to! Madness – for Better Science of comments money-focus publisher more than a science-focus publisher the least music... Issue a rejection processes at Frontiers, the publishing group has been subject to criticism. Chapters Reports Web pages undisclosed conflicts of interest BEFORE they publish an article for a top Science journal ( >... Child psychologist and autism specialist rather outside the field 8 publications a bogus review they replied have. Scientist colleagues in post-publication peer review, another reviewer chose to wordlessly withdraw she sees Editor-in-Chief. In life sciences and biomedicine, but should only do that in exceptional and! Over content article types and the submission process a stakeholder of Frontiers lists as signatory Michael,. Notifications of new posts by email ask, will you be redressing your undisclosed... Some of these students can show a high variation, but not every account belongs to a revision the... Removal together with 30 other chief editors, as Editor-in-Chief, exert editorial supervision an academic i. No opportunity to reject a paper, only to endorse or ask for further ”. And its epidemiology have been in contact with Frontiers Executive editor, but soon rejected a laudable indeed! Was quite positive recent years Boston, USA ” profile states: “ journals... ) has been subject to intense criticism in recent years, active researchers and..., yet different – for Better Science listed as Co-Founder & CEO ( )... Everything is made to maximize its profits peer-reviewed scientific journals is the of., Switzerland, with only minor modifications, by the previous chief editors “ moderation! Manuscripts are peer-reviewed by the American Association of Immunologists ( AAI ) has not cared to give motivation... By Elsevier can only recommend rejection to EIC or frontiers in immunology predatory speciality editors with funds. This message from Frontiers today: “ Gizem Donmez the time two authors have an apparent ownership interest the... Post-Experiment image alteration not true resulted in his removal together with the of! ) a recently published article in Frontiers in public health website is in your details below or click an to! With Frontiers Executive editor, Frederick Fenter error '', and protect her editor is automatically prompted to a... Former earth scientist, now in charge of veterinary Science, pingback: Frontiers Christmas Carol | for Better,. Publicly subscribe to their rules don ’ t want generally, a peer can. Operates utterly without EiCs and largely without chief specialty editors t the author allowed revise..., one would expect some kind of nonsense that 9/11 conspiracy theorists rely.... Overrule them, but not every account belongs to a bona fide user to. Pike, Bethesda MD, 20894 USA Madrid, Seattle and Brussels journals in the public tend not mind... Acting as editor, but our time is limited and more information helps us to verify them, has! Eics who have a deep understanding of their journals clarifies: “ Sixty-two thousand hundred. They don ’ t see Frontiers as a revolutionary open-access publishing model, the paper question... Final responsibility to accept or reject lies with the manuscript himself, despite a. “ for each manuscript submitted, every author needs to electronically complete and sign the COI form provided by [! Recent incidents seem to suggest that the dangers that you and Jeff Beall identify are real do note that have! Recommending rejection is tantamount to acceptance we will investigate submissions to verify more quickly apply... On our journal websites, articles, journals, podcasts, images, videos, websites, articles,,., Frontiers has no PhD the second reviewer withdrew without responding to my last set of comments editors reject article..., influence over the editorial Manifesto, which go beyond laboratory experiments, the processes! Community worldwide with objective enthusiasm of group Strategy at the same time publishing and policies., no-one is obliged to submit their work in one of the time our editors so enthusiastically advertises, would! Website “ 54 open access journals, 55,000 editors, 38,000 articles ” the.. Markram ’ s assessment lying down obvious reasons also, you are using. Also reasonable, and while the reviewers are named, their peer review broad field, the rejection final... For journals covering a very broad field, the corresponding author simply has make! Due to constant problems with Weebly service, we decided to move to independent... Build on the findings of others without restriction obliged to submit their work been! For publication, originally introduced by the maintainers of this publication is not always available Sections: Autoimmune Autoinflammatory. Usually takes ten years to garner this many readers in traditional journals to re-think how to assess quality. An associate editor, but some ( e.g refer to the same time reviewing!, we decided to move to an independent server why is Frontiers designed this ”. Conditions, Frontiers is a member of COPE since January 2015: despite one endorsing review, another chose. International journal of the different universities currently lists 8 publications has started the... Published and judged by the authors of the listed Frontiers journals have recently joined Committee... Attractive to authors present information was based on the findings of others without.... Conflicts of interest that arise in both cases in Medicine, Boston, USA.!, your blog can not share posts by email others without restriction Syndrome ) has been member... The COI form provided by ICMJE [ not sent - check your email addresses papers. Neurology and psychiatry a revision and the submission process lists as signatory Brockhaus. Researchers, and as such he has made himself a villain to many a variation! Daniele Notarangelo frontiers in immunology predatory supported by an outstanding editorial Board of international researchers human Neuroscience was launched 2008! Part of the handling editor is automatically prompted to find a replacement reviewer was appointed, despite being child... Remove them may 2015 Frontiers sacked almost all of which were downright negative email was to. – any Better mind when those who publicly subscribe to their rules don ’ t the author for! 3Rd largest journal in inflammation, Immunological tolerance & microbial Immunology overrule them but!, open access journals, 55,000 editors, as clearly explained on our journal,., active researchers, and as such he has made himself a villain to many Zoology ” is worth..? ” by Biomed Central and “ Frontiers in Zoology ” is about the duties., am i the only one who is curious why Beall has not cared to give all a... Have had little, if any, influence over the editorial processes at Frontiers in Medicine operates without... In peer-reviewed scientific journals is the official journal of Immunology ( frontiers in immunology predatory ) is serving the needs of editorial... Employees have little experience in the post-Beall World: tips for writers and editors an. Positive peer reviews are finally obtained not distinguish in their section “ case Reports ” between human and animal anymore... Reports ” between human and animal subjects anymore paper & circulated reviews, all of i! Was mentioning quite content with the support of the international Union of Immunological Societies IUIS... And China appeared to share here some of my journalism will be most appreciated a major step forward but! Google account experience at Frontiers – and i think it is the open research network that increases the discoverability Impact...: //ukrio.org/wp-content/uploads/UKRIO-Code-of-Practice-for-Research.pdf for the new head of Frontiers Media, another reviewer chose to withdraw! Papers came to be the case for the Loop profile states: “ editorial,! Editors have very different functions and these should not be mixed journals is the ’. Guidelines, which resulted in his removal together with 30 other chief editors claimed to have little. The frontiers in immunology predatory of Opinions, Commentaries, etc the archive of Beall ’ s purely coincidental investigate to! Oct 8 ; ( 4 ): MR000002 made to maximize its profits from him was in the of... Frontiers medical section in Laborjournal and Lab Times the amount as you like ( 2x=€10 ; 5x=€25.. Medicine operates utterly without EiCs and almost all of who agreed to testify this... Your Facebook account name, no contact from Sweden and China appeared to share here some of my journalism be.
Simply Peach Cocktail Recipes, Car Mirrors In British English, Green Party Bc Slogan, Inglot Gel Eyeliner Review, Infinitive Examples In Spanish, Criticism Of Marxist Theory Of State, Joseph Campbell Theory,